<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Is Not A Dangerous Website</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalkeyto.info/blogging/this-is-not-a-dangerous-website.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalkeyto.info/blogging/this-is-not-a-dangerous-website.html</link>
	<description>Website Development and Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 02:26:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JamesThoenes</title>
		<link>http://digitalkeyto.info/blogging/this-is-not-a-dangerous-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-31162</link>
		<dc:creator>JamesThoenes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalkeyto.info/blogging/this-is-not-a-dangerous-website.html#comment-31162</guid>
		<description>Thank you Louise. I do know some experienced internet marketers who have tested the theory. info&#039;s do seem to be ranked lower by SE&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>Thank you Louise. I do know some experienced internet marketers who have tested the theory. info&#8217;s do seem to be ranked lower by SE&#8217;s.</p>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louise</title>
		<link>http://digitalkeyto.info/blogging/this-is-not-a-dangerous-website.html/comment-page-1#comment-31160</link>
		<dc:creator>Louise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalkeyto.info/blogging/this-is-not-a-dangerous-website.html#comment-31160</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure that I buy the thesis that it is bad to have a .info domain.  Yes, .com&#039;s are going to have a lower percentage of spammy sites but that&#039;s because there are so many of them.

However, you may be onto something with regards to the Aksimet spam filter- it does tend to throw a wide, indiscriminate net.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<!-- google_ad_section_start --><p>I&#8217;m not sure that I buy the thesis that it is bad to have a .info domain.  Yes, .com&#8217;s are going to have a lower percentage of spammy sites but that&#8217;s because there are so many of them.</p>
<p>However, you may be onto something with regards to the Aksimet spam filter- it does tend to throw a wide, indiscriminate net.</p>
<!-- google_ad_section_end -->]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.504 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-01-21 05:45:05 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
